Board of Directors, Linear Technologies Essay Example for Free

progress of Directors, elongate Technologies EssayBased on the pecuniarys to date and the forward looking capital investments require matchless-dimensional should take for up their dividend payout by $0.01 per grapple. Entering the fourth quarter of 2003 the market seems to show continued signs of improvement. The company has shown plastered evolution and revenues atomic number 18 forecasted to exceed 2002s by 19%. The forecast shows net income coming in at $222.7m a robust 12% increase over last family. analogue has however increase its property holdings to be in scanty of $1.5b through various guidance initiatives. However this $1.5b has only shown investors a 4.25% growth which translates to $0.10 earnings per thoughtfulnesss pre-tax. This is in line with the companys history of conservatism. Looking in the lead the company does seem to have requirements to build a crude fabrication instalment as their facility is aging and is nearing its effective mathem atical function in its life cycle and will cost around $200m. analogue seems to have enough silver on hand to be able to invest their cash without supplement the company too much in the future. They have also not spent much on capital expenditures as a percentage of sales (2.2% in FY2002) this last year and should look to increase that in the future.By looking at the information above in the table we see that Linear has had a long history of stipendiary a dividend and has ample resources to pay out dividends Thus making them one of the graduate(prenominal)est in their sedulousness as noted in the table infra. The other options show extremes in the industry and prove to be too far out there in terms of this industry. engineering companies are known for investing their cash in RD as well and Linear needs to be aggressive in using its cash reserves in a higher and better use that will in turn show investors more returns as well as volunteer a health dividend amongst their peers. This is in line with what their investors have come to expect over the last 3 geezerhood and any significant adjustment now would not signal well in the markets. This increase would press their dividend payouts to over $66m (a 22% increase from FY2002).History/Analysis of the Dividend Policy at LinearLinear management started issuing dividends when they were sure of the sustainable profit magnate and cash flow and understood that if they started a dividend that they would have to take hold this in the long run. They understood that investors dont react well when a company lettuce paying a dividend. Hence starting small at and gradually increasing the dividends over measure as seen in the chart below while the dividend yield took a large hit in 2000 and rebounded in 2002. (Starting at $0.00625 dividend per share in 1992 after they went public in 1986 to a high of $.05 per share today)The Primary reasons to start issuing the dividend highlighted by the management were Company is financially well positioned with the sustained cash flow since IPO Show investors that Linear is a less risky investment (compared to other technical school firms) Tap in the investors interest grouped in income goals along with growth goals (more attractive than the low bank interest instruments) Management feels that increasing the dividend either year even during a tough economic time was close signaling.One thing to note is that Linear did not just limit itself to dividends but also leveraged the share repurchase (based on the market conditions), as a vehicle to give cash back to the investors. In 2003, company has recovered ($198m net income) from the 2001 fadeoutary slump but still more than 50% below the peak in 2001 ($427m net income.) Moreover, sales and profit grew at 3% and 7% respectively are still far below 2001 levels. Dividend payouts set out the stocks less volatile too. On the other hand, when a applied science growth company start paying dividend it can be concluded that company believes that shareholders can make higher return by investing somewhere else.Porters 5 Forces to date Dividend and buyback policies at Linear Overall Market Big market scandals, Enron and World-Com were cooking the accounting books to show growth. every(prenominal) year an investor can get the real money from the dividend (a bird in hand,) but stock growth is just on paper (two birds in the bush, considering the recent big accounting scandals). Even the Fortune phrase in 2002 suggested that expiration forward a growing share of investment returns willbe from the dividend income. childly Proposal Raise by $0.01The goal of payout insurance is to ensure that funds are allocated optimally across firms and their investors. Having said that, several facts speak in favor of raising Linears dividend by one cent and not swinging the pendulum in one direction or the other. Excess cash-to-operations approach for 2003 (first trine quarters) Dividends paid $47 millio nOperating Cash Flow $180.1 million with the majority of cash qualifying towards stock repurchases. ($165.7 million) while $13.2 million ended up on the firms balance sheet. With 312.4million shares outstanding, Linears additional expenditures with a $0.06 dividend would be $3.1million per quarter or $12.5million annually. Given the corporations financial situation, this is perfectly feasible as seen in the chart below.This would slightly change the dividend yield as seen in the charts below. The company has a very strong cash balance of over $1.5 billion in which to strategically invest In view of the upcoming changes in tax law, raising dividends enjoys support from major shareholders It could emfly help attract additional investors, such as mutual funds and European investment firms It would be consis xt with the firms dividend payout history the dividends have been increasing by one cent every year since 1999 The company is not planning any major acquisition for which cash wou ld be requiredMiddle-ground proposal Send 1/3 FCF to Dividends, 1/3 FCF to buybacks An option to balance the historical and the passageway forward for dividend pay would be to adopt the idea of paying one third of their earnings per Blaine Rollins, drawing card portfolio manager of Janus Fund. For companies with strong excess cash flow such as Linear, I would suggest frugality a third of the cash for a rainy day and sharing the other two-thirds with investors, split equally between dividends and buybacks. Heres the historical data of the actual paid and the percentage of their excess cash flow If we follow the advice from Rollins, heres the middle ground proposal allocating 1/3 of excess cash flow towards dividends. Assuming the Q4 will be similar to the first 3 quarters in 2003, we can estimate that the net income to be $227.5Mand FCFE to be $240M. By taking 1/3, we can root on dividend for 2003E (estimate) would be $80M. The dividend yield would increase slightly from .4% to . 6% a well in the charts above.EconomyDue to the recession in 2001, the overall economy is not growing strong but theres no clear sign of a major decline. SP500 has remained steady over the past few years and with a favorable tax plan, it a signal to the investors that Linear remains a great investment luck when people are generally trying to hold on to their cash. IndustryAlthough this is still higher than the industry standard, Linear has maintained a strong cash balance and by rewarding the investors, with a high dividend, it would signal strong growth and attract future investors looking for steady income revenue. This would also be a point of differentiation amongst its competitors and allow Linear to stand out amongst the crowd. However, a concern is a potential message that there is no future growth RD/projects in the pipeline. Linears current circumstanceLinear is in a strong financial position to pay aggressive dividends and theres no apparent risk in increasing dividends to the company. However, some factors to consider are potentially wanting(p) out on capital growth investments and executive pay restrictions.Radical Proposal Distribute either CashA radical proposal for Linear Technology would be to distribute all of their cash. winning this to the extreme, it would include the $1.5 billion cash balance they currently have as well as paying all of their cash flow for each of the subsequent years. The $1.5 billion they have on hand would win a dividend of approximately $5.00 per share. This would represent a dividend yield of 16.2%. If they chose to continue this policy on a going forward basis it would provide a very volatile dividend. Looking at the past ten years of data, this strategy would give investors a dividend between $0.13 and $1.34 per share.EconomyThe economy still hasnt rebounded from the recession of 2001. Although Linear Technologies had never had a year with negative cash flow, there was significant uncertainty in the market and b y distributing all of their cash they would be in a position where they could not make a mistake if it fell further. IndustryThis would imply to investors that they do not have growth opportunities that would provide investors attractive returns. Investors prefer to have a predictable dividend, by doing this they would create uncertainty in their dividend policy in the future. Even if they decided not to payout all of their cash every year, by doing it one year they risk setting a precedent that if cash gets to $1.5 billion it will be used for a dividend. This would provide a dividend yield to investors of 16.2%. This is significantly higher than the 0.3% average for the Information Technology sector as a whole. Moreover, if they continued this policy moving forward they would continue to distinguish themselves from the other tech firms by having a much higher dividend yield. Linears current circumstanceThey run the risk of absent out on opportunities for acquisitions or investment in their existing business. Even if they didnt see opportunities at the current time, starting the year with a zero cash balance would greatly diminish their ability to finance any expansions or acquisitions. They would be forced to finance those opportunities through debt or raising new equity.